I’m educated in relativity and quantum physics and other fields, but I do not see the place of antigravity. Maybe it is good luck, because such a force would likely decrease proportionally to the radius squared of the distance from Earth’s center. Gravifugal force decreases linearly, which makes it much more powerful and suitable for propulsion than this hypothetical antigravity force would be. It’s good luck that I pursued the research that I did… Hypothetically, Antigravity "should be" one of fundamental forces. In contrast, gravifugal force is just a reaction to action of gravipetal force. Gravipetal force is a gravity functioning as a centripetal force. Astronauts and him spaceships e.g. are subjected to the gravipetal force, which continuously bends their trajectory into circular shape. The reactionary force is “gravifugal”, which allows the levitation of astronauts and their spacecraft.
Download American Antigravity Interview
If satellites were motionless, they would rapidly plummet to Earth - but they don't because of a magic ratio between forward velocity and the rate at which they fall, giving them a stable orbit at any altitude. This concept captivated Professor Petar Bosnic, leading him to a simple question: could a rapidly rotating ring create lift in the same manner that a satellite remains in free-fall? He joins us to talk about his vision for a new propulsion from the concept of "Gravifugal Force"
Read more about Antigravity and gravifugal force.
All other articles, science papers, etc. are available in their respective categories. Recently published articles are available in shortened form on left side.
Are you having a hard time finding articles. Use sitemap or archive for quick overview,